<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>


<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Longevity Meme News and Commentary</title>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org</link>
<description>The latest news, commentary, and opinions on healthy life extension and longevity science.</description>
<language>en-us</language>



<copyright>Commentary is Copyright C 2001-2010 The Longevity Meme. Please see http://www.longevitymeme.org/syndication.cfm for terms of use and attribution.</copyright>
<webMaster>longevitymeme@longevitymeme.org</webMaster>
<managingEditor>longevitymeme@longevitymeme.org</managingEditor>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:54:06 CST</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:54:06 CST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
<title>Ouroboros on Cryonics</title>
<category>Healthy Life Extension Community</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4588</link>
<description>Chris Patil of &lt;a href=http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/corpsicles-in-the-new-yorker/&gt;Ouroboros&lt;/a&gt; is a &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/topics/cryonics.cfm&gt;cryonics&lt;/a&gt; skeptic: &quot;I&apos;m a cryonics skeptic of the &apos;extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence&apos; flavor. As I&apos;ve said before, I suspect that long-term preservation of the potential for life by freezing or other means is physically possible, but at present I don&apos;t think were making any significant progress in that direction. Part of the problem is that there&apos;s very little serious initiative within the mainstream of academia or industry to build the many, many necessary precursor technologies. Another part is that the problem is really, really hard - harder than the comparatively simple but still unsolved problem of maintaining cellular viability within tissues at low temperatures.&quot; From reading what he&apos;s written, I think he&apos;s either out of the loop on &lt;a href=http://www.benbest.com/cryonics/vitrify.html&gt;the technology of vitrification&lt;/a&gt;, or not convinced that present day vitrification methods as used by &lt;a href=http://www.alcor.org&gt;Alcor&lt;/a&gt; are actually going to preserve fine structure in brain cells (i.e. preserve the data that is the mind). I disagree with him on that last point, if that is his view - the evidence clearly points to the &lt;a href=http://www.alcor.org/Library/html/vitrification.html&gt;viability of vitrification&lt;/a&gt; on that count.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/corpsicles-in-the-new-yorker/&gt;http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/corpsicles-in-the-new-yorker/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:54:06 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4588</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Curing Osteoporosis By Manipulating Serotonin</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4587</link>
<description>A novel approach to the treatment of age-related bone loss is demonstrated: &quot;An investigational drug that inhibits &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin&gt;serotonin&lt;/a&gt; synthesis in the gut, administered orally once daily, effectively cured &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteoporosis&gt;osteoporosis&lt;/a&gt; in mice and rats ... Serotonin in the gut has been shown in recent research to stall bone formation. The finding could lead to new therapies that build new bone; most current drugs for osteoporosis can only prevent the breakdown of old bone. ... Prior to this discovery, serotonin was primarily known as a &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotransmitter&gt;neurotransmitter&lt;/a&gt; acting in the brain. Yet, 95 percent of the body&apos;s serotonin is found in the gut, where its major function is to inhibit bone formation (the remaining five percent is in the brain, where it regulates mood, among other critical functions). By turning off the intestine&apos;s release of serotonin, the team was able, in this new study, to cure osteoporosis in mice that had undergone menopause. ... [Researchers] administered the compound orally, once daily, at a small dose, for up to six weeks to rodents experiencing post-menopausal osteoporosis. Results demonstrated that osteoporosis was prevented from developing, or when already present, could be fully cured. Of critical importance, levels of serotonin were normal in the brain, which indicated that the compound did not enter the general circulation and was unable to cross the &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood-brain_barrier&gt;blood-brain barrier&lt;/a&gt;, thereby avoiding many potential side effects.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/cumc-isi020110.php&gt;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/cumc-isi020110.php&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:09:34 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4587</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>TERC, Telomeres, and Rate of Aging</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4586</link>
<description>The title of this &lt;a href=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uol-sif020410.php&gt;EurekAlert!&lt;/a&gt; release is misleading - this isn&apos;t the first identified genetic variant associated with human longevity. But is is nonetheless interesting: scientists &quot;have identified for the first time definitive variants associated with biological ageing in humans. The team analyzed more than 500,000 genetic variations across the entire human genome to identify the variants which are located near a gene called &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomerase_RNA_component&gt;TERC&lt;/a&gt;. ...  two forms of ageing - chronological ageing i.e. how old you are in years and biological ageing whereby the cells of some individuals are older (or younger) than suggested by their actual age. ... There is accumulating evidence that the risk of age-associated diseases including heart disease and some types of cancers are more closely related to biological rather than chronological age. What we studied are structures called &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telomere&gt;telomeres&lt;/a&gt; which are parts of one&apos;s &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome&gt;chromosomes&lt;/a&gt;. Individuals are born with telomeres of certain length and in many cells telomeres shorten as the cells divide and age. Telomere length is therefore &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2008/05/on-the-erosion-of-telomeres.php&gt;considered a marker of biological ageing&lt;/a&gt;. In this study what we found was that those individuals carrying a particular genetic variant had shorter telomeres i.e. looked biologically older. ... The effect was quite considerable in those with the variant, equivalent to between 3-4 years of &apos;biological aging&apos; as measured by telomere length loss.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uol-sif020410.php&gt;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/uol-sif020410.php&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:02:49 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4586</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Nanoparticles, Lasers, and Cancer</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4585</link>
<description>Researchers have been killing cancer cells in the lab through a combination of targeted &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoparticle&gt;nanoparticles&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4186&gt;laser heating&lt;/a&gt; for a couple of years now, but here is an interesting advance on that method: scientists &quot;have discovered a new technique for singling out individual diseased cells and destroying them with tiny explosions. The scientists used lasers to make &apos;nanobubbles&apos; by zapping gold nanoparticles inside cells. In tests on cancer cells, they found they could tune the lasers to create either small, bright bubbles that were visible but harmless or large bubbles that burst the cells. ... Single-cell targeting is one of the most touted advantages of nanomedicine, and our approach delivers on that promise with a localized effect inside an individual cell. The idea is to spot and treat unhealthy cells early, before a disease progresses to the point of making people extremely ill. ... In laboratory studies published last year [researchers also] applied nanobubbles to &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheroma&gt;arterial plaque&lt;/a&gt;. They found that they could blast right through the deposits that block arteries. ...The bubbles work like a jackhammer. ... nanobubble technology could be used for &apos;theranostics,&apos; a single process that combines diagnosis and therapy. In addition, because the cell-bursting nanobubbles also show up on microscopes in real time, [the] technique can be use for post-therapeutic assessment, or what physicians often refer to as &apos;guidance.&apos;&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/ru-rpk020410.php&gt;http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-02/ru-rpk020410.php&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:59:11 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4585</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>To Cure Aging: How Much and How Long?</title>
<category>Healthy Life Extension Community</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4584</link>
<description>From the &lt;a href=http://maxlifefoundation.typepad.com/maximum-life-foundation/2010/02/david-kekich-how-long-will-it-take-and-how-much-will-it-cost-to-cure-aging.html&gt;Maximum Life Foundation blog&lt;/a&gt;, a video from the &lt;a href=http://manhattanbeachproject.com/&gt;Manhattan Beach Project&lt;/a&gt; meeting on the projected cost and time taken to develop various aging-slowdown or actual rejuvenation therapies: &quot;How much will it cost and how long will it take to develop an effective &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie_restriction_mimetic&gt;caloric restriction mimetic&lt;/a&gt; - one that will add many years if not decades to the human lifespan? What will it take to come up with a drug that &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2008/05/on-the-erosion-of-telomeres.php&gt;turns on telomerase and thus lengthens telomeres?&lt;/a&gt; How about &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2009/09/prospects-for-immune-system-rejuvenation.php&gt;immune system restoration&lt;/a&gt;, tissue/organ storage, &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2008/01/targeting-mitochondria.php&gt;mitochondrial medicine&lt;/a&gt;, and other medical technologies?&quot; For another perspective on time and cost, you might look at the &lt;a href=http://www.sens.org&gt;SENS Foundation&lt;/a&gt; information on pushing to completion therapies for the &lt;a href=http://www.sens.org/index.php?pagename=mj_sens_repairing&gt;seven contributing aspects of aging&lt;/a&gt;. We could expect working rejuvenation in mice with &lt;a href=http://www.sens.org/index.php?pagename=sensf_faq_timeframe&gt;ten years of work and a billion dollars&lt;/a&gt;, for example - the challenge has always been convincing people that this is in fact the case, and raising those funds. Predicting how long it will take to move from mice to people is much harder, as this depends &lt;a href=http://fightaging.org/archives/2008/05/envisaging-a-world-without-the-fda.php&gt;far more on regulation and politics&lt;/a&gt; than anything else. Two decades doesn&apos;t seem unreasonable in the present environment.

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://maxlifefoundation.typepad.com/maximum-life-foundation/2010/02/david-kekich-how-long-will-it-take-and-how-much-will-it-cost-to-cure-aging.html&gt;http://maxlifefoundation.typepad.com/maximum-life-foundation/2010/02/david-kekich-how-long-will-it-take-and-how-much-will-it-cost-to-cure-aging.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:49:21 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4584</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Working on Lung Regeneration</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4583</link>
<description>Via &lt;a href=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100203091221.htm&gt;ScienceDaily&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Stem cell researchers exploring a new approach for the care of respiratory diseases report that an experimental treatment involving transplantable lung cells was associated with improved outcomes in tests on mice with acute lung injury. ... &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respiratory_disease&gt;Respiratory diseases&lt;/a&gt; are a major cause of mortality and &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morbidity&gt;morbidity&lt;/a&gt; worldwide. Current treatments offer no prospect of cure or disease reversal. Transplantation of pulmonary &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progenitor_cell&gt;progenitor cells&lt;/a&gt; derived from human &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embryonic_stem_cell&gt;embryonic stem cells&lt;/a&gt; may provide a novel approach to regenerate &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endogenous&gt;endogenous&lt;/a&gt; lung cells destroyed by injury and disease. ... [Researchers] used a genetic selection procedure they created to generate a type of lung cell known as &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulmonary_alveolus&gt;alveolar&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epithelium&gt;epithelial&lt;/a&gt; type II, which secretes &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surfactant&gt;surfactant&lt;/a&gt;, a substance that keeps the lung inflated, and can turn into another important lung cell that regulates the transfer of oxygen into the blood and the removal of carbon dioxide. ... the experimental stem cell treatment [not only] prevented or reversed visual hallmarks of pulmonary injury, but also restored near normal lung function to mice. ... additional tests in other animal models and eventually humans will be needed before these cell transplants can be used to treat respiratory diseases.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100203091221.htm&gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100203091221.htm&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:33:52 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4583</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>An Article on Calorie Restriction</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4582</link>
<description>From the &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darya-pino/can-you-live-longer-by-cu_b_447907.html&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;, an article on the science and practice of &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/topics/calorie_restriction.cfm&gt;calorie restriction&lt;/a&gt; that focuses on extended longevity, and so manages to omit mention of the &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=1335&gt;demonstrated health benefits in human studies&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;The science of aging is among the most dynamic and provocative in modern biology. Over the past two decades we have seen a virtual explosion in research investigating the molecular and behavioral systems that control the aging process. But the more researchers uncover about the science of aging, the more questions emerge. Dietary restriction has long been considered the most potent regulator of aging. Restricting food intake by any means induces a series of metabolic changes in organisms from yeast to primates that serve to extend life. &lt;a href=http://calerie.dcri.duke.edu/&gt;Studies are currently underway&lt;/a&gt; to investigate the ability of dietary restriction to extend life in humans. ... The genes linking diet and aging are highly &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conserved_sequence&gt;conserved through evolution&lt;/a&gt;, indicating that there is a great chance human aging is sensitive to diet. Indeed, insulin-related genes have been &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2008/05/igf1-and-life-expectancy-in-the-elderly.php&gt;found to be important&lt;/a&gt; in long-lived human populations. This suggests that the pathways discovered in worms and other organisms have similar functions in humans. What is not clear is &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=1892&gt;how much influence diet has on lifespan&lt;/a&gt; and to what extent we are able to manipulate it.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darya-pino/can-you-live-longer-by-cu_b_447907.html&gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darya-pino/can-you-live-longer-by-cu_b_447907.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:14:43 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4582</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rapamycin Reviewed at Ouroboros</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4581</link>
<description>From &lt;a href=http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/rapamycin-reviewed/&gt;Ouroboros&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;One of [the] most significant breakthroughs [in biogerontology] last year was the announcement that the &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapamycin&gt;macrolide drug rapamycin&lt;/a&gt; can &lt;a href=http://www.fightaging.org/archives/2009/07/latelife-administration-of-rapamycin-extends-life-in-mice.php&gt;extend longevity in mice&lt;/a&gt;. More specifically, rapamycin can accomplish this when administered to adult, wildtype mice. In other words, no genetic modification or early-life intervention is necessary, making rapamycin one of the first compounds that meets the criteria for an anti-aging drug that could be used for people who are already alive and well down the road toward aging themselves. The lifespan extension achieved is modest (~10%), but this is more impressive in light of the fact that the mice were quite old at the time treatment began, and the study used only a single dose rate. Future studies will undoubtedly seek to optimize the dose and regimen with the goal of achieving greater enhancement of lifespan. How does it work? As the saying goes, further study is required, and at multiple levels. ... There&apos;s a good deal left to discover about the rapamycins effects on aging in general - and regarding the specific mechanistic relationship between translational control, senescence, and organismal aging - but I have it on good authority that there&apos;s a great deal of effort being exerted in that direction. Watch this space for future developments.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/rapamycin-reviewed/&gt;http://ouroboros.wordpress.com/2010/02/02/rapamycin-reviewed/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:16:34 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4581</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Deathist Viewpoint</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4580</link>
<description>From &lt;a href=http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/02/fukuyamas.html&gt;EconLog&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;Ron Bailey&apos;s &lt;a href=http://www.amazon.com/Liberation-Biology-Scientific-Biotech-Revolution/dp/1591022274&gt;Liberation Biology&lt;/a&gt; quoted &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Fukuyama&gt;Frank Fukuyama&lt;/a&gt;: &apos;Life extension seems to me a perfect example of something that is a &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_externality&gt;negative externality&lt;/a&gt;, meaning that it is individually rational and desirable for any given individual, but it has costs for society that can be negative.&apos; I couldn&apos;t believe my eyes. Did Frank Fukuyama actually mean that when a person has another year of healthy life, the net effect on other people is negative? If so, why do people cry at funerals, instead of celebrating? Fukuyama&apos;s statement was so hateful and twisted that I wondered if he was being quoted out of context. So I dug up the full paragraph ... The extra words definitely make Fukuyama&apos;s position more confusing, but they take away none of the horror. The extra words definitely make Fukuyama&apos;s position more confusing, but they take away none of the horror.  You&apos;d think that a &apos;perfect example&apos; of a negative externality would be easy to explain and hard to dispute - like air pollution. But to make his case, Fukuyama has to appeal to the controversial notion of &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_selection&gt;group selection&lt;/a&gt;: Human beings evolved to die because it&apos;s adaptive for society.  His specific mechanism - death stops elders from impeding progress - would be controversial even for believers in group selection.  After all, during our evolutionary history, there was almost no progress to impede! ... On purely pragmatic grounds, then, Fukuyama&apos;s argument is about as feeble as &apos;Life extension is bad for morticians.&apos;&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/02/fukuyamas.html&gt;http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2010/02/fukuyamas.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:10:15 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4580</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Premiere Screening of To Age or Not to Age</title>
<category>Healthy Life Extension Community</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4579</link>
<description>A new film on aging and longevity science, &lt;a href=http://www.toageornottoage.com/&gt;&quot;To Age or Not to Age,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; will be premiered in New York on February 11th, with a discussion panel of biogerontologists to follow: &quot;The New York City screening will be followed by a live panel discussion. The panel discussion will be simulcast to venues screening the film nationwide and will stream live online. Panelists include: &lt;a href=http://www.ilcusa.org/pages/about-us/president-ceo.php&gt;Dr. Robert Butler&lt;/a&gt;, Gerontologist, Psychiatrist &amp; Pulitzer-Prize Winner; President and CEO of the &lt;a href=http://www.ilcusa.org/&gt;International Longevity Center&lt;/a&gt;. ... &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubrey_de_Grey&gt;Dr. Aubrey de Grey&lt;/a&gt;, Biomedical Gerontologist; Chief Science Officer, &lt;a href=http://www.sens.org&gt;SENS Foundation&lt;/a&gt;. ... &lt;a href=http://web.mit.edu/biology/guarente/&gt;Dr. Leonard P. Guarente&lt;/a&gt;, Novartis Professor of Biology, MIT; Director, &lt;a href=http://medapps.med.harvard.edu/agingresearch/index.htm&gt;Paul F. Glenn Lab for Science of Aging&lt;/a&gt;. ... &lt;a href=http://www.buckinstitute.org/TheScience/thelithgow/&gt;Dr. Gordon Lithgow&lt;/a&gt;, Biomolecular Geneticist; Head of the Lithgow Lab, &lt;a href=http://www.buckinstitute.org&gt;Buck Institute on Aging&lt;/a&gt;. Moderated by Robert Kane Pappas, director of To Age or Not to Age. The scientists featured in To Age or Not to Age have found the means to postpone and possibly mitigate diseases tied to aging, such as cancer, &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardiovascular_disease&gt;cardiovascular disease&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodegenerative_disease&gt;neurodegenerative diseases&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_2_diabetes&gt;diabetes&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; 

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.toageornottoage.com/&gt;http://www.toageornottoage.com/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:21:53 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4579</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title>Improving the Human Immune System</title>
<category>Medicine, Biotech, Research</category>
<link>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item_rss.cfm?news_id=4578</link>
<description>From &lt;a href=http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/bio/re-engineering-human-immune-system&gt;h+ Magazine&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;For now, the best way to supplement the body&apos;s own defenses is through &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine&gt;vaccines&lt;/a&gt;, but vaccines are far from a panacea. Each vaccine must be prepared in advance, few vaccines provide full protection to everybody, and despite popular misconception, even fewer last a lifetime. For example, smallpox vaccinations were lifelong, but tetanus vaccines generally last 5-10 years. There is still no vaccine for HIV infection. And when it comes to bacteria like tuberculosis, current vaccines are almost entirely ineffective. What&apos;s more, the whole process is achingly indirect. Vaccines work by first stimulating &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_cell&gt;B cells&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_cell&gt;T cells&lt;/a&gt; in order to induce production of &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody&gt;antibodies&lt;/a&gt;. They don&apos;t directly produce the needed antibodies. Rather, they try (not always successfully) to get the body to generate its own antibodies. In turn, stimulation of T cells requires yet another set of cells - called &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendritic_cell&gt;dendritic cells&lt;/a&gt; - and the presence of a diverse set of molecules called the &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex&gt;major histocompatibility complex&lt;/a&gt;, creating still further complexity in generating an immune response. Our best hope may be to cut out the middleman. Rather than merely hoping that the vaccine will indirectly lead to the antibody an individual needs, imagine if we could genetically engineer these antibodies and make them available as needed. Call it immunity-on-demand. At first blush, the idea might seem farfetched. But there&apos;s a good chance this system, or something like it, will actually be in place within decades.&quot;

&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View the Article Under Discussion: &lt;a href=http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/bio/re-engineering-human-immune-system&gt;http://www.hplusmagazine.com/articles/bio/re-engineering-human-immune-system&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Read More Longevity Meme Commentary: &lt;a href=http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&gt;http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:55:41 CST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.longevitymeme.org/news/view_news_item.cfm?news_id=4578</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
