live healthily - fight aging - extend your life
"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"
Home Search Take Action! Articles Daily News Newsletter Fight Aging! Blog Press Room Resources About Contact
Hot Topics: Activism - Anti-Aging - Calorie Restriction - Cryonics - Negligible Senescence - Our Community - Research Prizes - Stem Cells - Transhumanism
Start Here!
Are you new to healthy life extension? Click here to find out more about living a longer, healthier life. More >>
Take Action!
You can help to make therapies for aging and life extension medicine a reality. Click here to participate in improving your future health and longevity!
LM Newsletter
Sign up for our weekly newsletter! It contains news, opinions, and commentary for people interested in healthy life extension: making use of diet, lifestyle choices, technology, and proven medical advances to live longer, healthier lives.

Requested Daily News Article

The Challenge of Aging Studies (Thursday February 18 2010)
Wired notes the challenges inherent in any present study of a potential life-extending therapy in humans: "Longevity is one of the hottest areas of science, but there's a curious hole in the research: Scientifically speaking, nobody knows how to measure aging, much less predict reliably how people will respond to time's ravages. ... Unlike models of drug development for the diseases of aging, which have consensus endpoints to evaluate, we have not reached a consensus in aging. We don't know how to predict how someone will function later in life, and we need to. ... That such a basic gap exists seems counterintuitive. After all, longevity-enhancing research has never been so prominent. ... We need to have a set of thousands of people, representing all groups, that are closely followed on health measures. They'd be tested three or four times a year, for five or 10 years. Then you'd have a good sense of the trajectory of aging ... people enrolled in the proposed study could, after several years, opt to take rapamycin. That would let researchers see whether it works in people as it does in mice. If so, they'd also have a detailed account of resulting gene and protein changes, and insight into whether rapamycin works better in some people than others. ... But take rapamycin out of the equation, and a long-term study of aging biomarkers would be suitable for institutional funding. Of course, it would still be expensive. But even a long-term study of aging in rodents would be useful, and it would also be more affordable. ... If we had a set of biomarkers that at 12 months of age predicted which mice would die younger or older, then we could shorten mouse studies to 12 months."
Link to original article  
Share |
 

Prior News

Later News

We help you stay up to date with the most interesting news in medicine, politics and the healthy life extension community. You can help us by contacting us when you see interesting items online. You can search past news postings through Google by using the form to the right.
Search Past News

   

Search